Sponsor   

Medical Terminology Daily (MTD) is a blog sponsored by Clinical Anatomy Associates, Inc. as a service to the medical community, medical students, and the medical industry. We post anatomical, medical or surgical terms, their meaning and usage, as well as biographical notes on anatomists, surgeons, and researchers through the ages. Be warned that some of the images used depict human anatomical specimens.

Click on the link below to subscribe to the MTD newsletter. If you think an article could be interesting to somebody else, feel free to forward the link of the article. Should you want to use the information on the article, please follow the CAA, Inc Privacy and Security Statement found at the bottom of this page. 

You are welcome to submit questions and suggestions using our "Contact Us" form. The information on this blog follows the terms on our "Privacy and Security Statement"  and cannot be construed as medical guidance or instructions for treatment. 


We have 81 guests online


A Moment in History

Self-portrait, Henry Vandyke Carter, MD (Public Domain)
Self-portrait, Henry Vandyke Carter, MD (Public Domain)

Henry Vandyke Carter, MD
(1831 – 1897)

English physician, surgeon, medical artist, and a pioneer in leprosy and mycetoma studies.  HV Carter was born in Yorkshire in 1831. He was the son of Henry Barlow Carter, a well-known artist and it is possible that he honed his natural talents with his father. His mother picked his middle name after a famous painter, Anthony Van Dyck. This is probably why his name is sometimes shown as Henry Van Dyke Carter, although the most common presentation of his middle name is Vandyke.

Having problems to finance his medical studies, HV Carter trained as an apothecary and later as an anatomical demonstrator at St. George’s Hospital in London, where he met Henry Gray (1872-1861), who was at the time the anatomical lecturer. Having seen the quality of HV Carter’s drawings, Henry Gray teamed with him to produce one of the most popular and longer-lived anatomy books in history: “Gray’s Anatomy”, which was first published in late 1857.  The book itself, about which many papers have been written, was immediately accepted and praised because of the clarity of the text as well as the incredible drawings of Henry Vandyke Carter.

While working on the book’s drawings, HV Carter continued his studies and received his MD in 1856.

In spite of initially being offered a co-authorship of the book, Dr. Carter was relegated to the position of illustrator by Henry Gray and never saw the royalties that the book could have generated for him. For all his work and dedication, Dr. Carter only received a one-time payment of 150 pounds. Dr.  Carter never worked again with Gray, who died of smallpox only a few years later.

Frustrated, Dr. Carter took the exams for the India Medical Service.  In 1858 he joined as an Assistant Surgeon and later became a professor of anatomy and physiology. Even later he served as a Civil Surgeon. During his tenure with the India Medical Service he attained the ranks of Surgeon, Surgeon-Major, Surgeon-Lieutenant-Colonel, and Brigade-Surgeon.

Dr. Carter dedicated the rest of his life to the study of leprosy, and other ailments typical of India at that time. He held several important offices, including that of Dean of the Medical School of the University of Bombay. In 1890, after his retirement, he was appointed Honorary Physician to the Queen.

Dr. Henry Vandyke Carter died of tuberculosis in 1897.

Personal note: Had history been different, this famous book would have been called “Gray and Carter’s Anatomy” and Dr. Carter never gone to India. His legacy is still seen in the images of the thousands of copies of “Gray’s Anatomy” throughout the world and the many reproductions of his work available on the Internet. We are proud to use some of his images in this blog. The image accompanying this article is a self-portrait of Dr. Carter. Click on the image for a larger depiction. Dr. Miranda

Sources:
1. “Obituary: Henry Vandyke Carter” Br Med J (1897);1:1256-7
2. “The Anatomist: A True Story of ‘Gray’s Anatomy” Hayes W. (2007) USA: Ballantine
3. “A Glimpse of Our Past: Henry Gray’s Anatomy” Pearce, JMS. J Clin Anat (2009) 22:291–295
4. “Henry Gray and Henry Vandyke Carter: Creators of a famous textbook” Roberts S. J Med Biogr (2000) 8:206–212.
5. “Henry Vandyke Carter and his meritorious works in India” Tappa, DM et al. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol (2011) 77:101-3


"Clinical Anatomy Associates, Inc., and the contributors of "Medical Terminology Daily" wish to thank all individuals who donate their bodies and tissues for the advancement of education and research”.

Click here for more information


Rare & Collectible Books at AbeBooks.com 

bookplateink.com

 

Did Andreas Vesalius really die from scurvy? (2)


Did Andreas Vesalius really die from scurvy on the island of Zakynthos in 1564?
Evidence does not support this theory.

NOTE:  The following article authored by Theo Dirix, and Dr. Rudi Coninx, is a rebuttal of Pavlos Plessas' theory that Andreas Vesalius indeed died from scurvy. The original article entitled "Powerful indications that Vesalius died from scurvy" by Pavlos Plessas was presented in a meeting at the island of Zakynthos in 2014.


For the first segment of this article, click here.

...continued...

We believe the arguments in favour of scurvy unfortunately are not sufficient to draw a conclusion. And for each of the argument in favour of the scurvy theory, there are strong counterarguments too.

We will examine the main arguments here

1. Travelers to the Holy Land did have not enough food to eat that contained vitamin C.

There is no evidence that Vesalius, a man of means with introduction letters from the King of Spain, was deprived of food during his travels in the Holy Land. He could certainly buy food, and probably stayed at monasteries, sharing the same food that protected the residing monks from developing scurvy. And while scurvy was not uncommon, residents did not die in large numbers because of lack of vitamin C. Dying from scurvy was, even then, was limited to a small segment of the population.

Minimal daily intake of vitamin C for an adult is 90 mg per day [aa]. Most of that intake comes from fruits and vegetables (oranges, grapefruits …) but liver and kidney are also sources of vitamin C. These are all foods that Vesalius would have consumed in Jerusalem.

Theo Dirix and Dr. Rudi Coninx, authors of this article
Dr. Rudi Coninx, and Theo Dirix, authors of this article

2. The long sea voyage led to scurvy.

The sea voyage is too short (40 days) to develop scurvy. It takes about three months (120 days) for scurvy to develop [8]. In one study it took healthy volunteers four months to develop signs of scurvy when fed a vitamin C deprived diet [9] although some showed signs at day 29. The first sign to appear was petechial haemorrhage. In 1939, Johan Crandon, a surgical resident at Boston City Hospital, experimented on himself by eating a diet totally devoid of vitamin C [x]. Fatigue developed after 3 to 4 months, and the pathognomonic hyperkeratotic papules appeared on day 134 and the perifollicular haemorrhages on the legs on day 162. Symptoms appear after 3 to 4 months only, and there is no evidence of this in any description of Vesalius symptoms.

It has also been argued that the trip through the Sinai desert must have contributed to the presumed low intake of vitamin C. 
Vesalius’s entire stay in the Holy Land, including the Sinai desert trip –presumably lasting a month and a half- did not last for more than 4 months: he arrived in Jerusalem in May 1564 and boarded ship in Alexandria in September 1564. We believe this is not long enough to deplete all vitamin C and cause symptoms, even adding a 40 day sea voyage. And it is unlikely that his stay in Jerusalem was entirely free of vitamin C, as he was a respected guest of high authorities. We know that there was “no hint of shortages before their departure from Egypt” [Plessas]

Most studies indicate the earliest detectable change occurs after 120 to 180 days [xx] although there are studies where early signs appear earlier [xxx]. But in this study, which was stopped after 3 months, no serious effects occurred.

3. “Clinical description is typical for scurvy”.

This is simply not true. The clinical description we have, from second hand accounts, are vague and non-specific. The clinical signs and symptoms of scurvy are well known and clearly described today [10]. The typical clinical signs for scurvy are absent from all accounts: gingival bleeding, an early and typical sign, or the “rotten mound” is never mentioned. Subcutaneous bleeding [11] – ecchymoses - or joint pains, leading to difficulties walking, are never mentioned. Gum bleeding are typical signs, and so are swollen and painful legs, also leading to difficulties in walking [12]. They are all absent from the accounts. Non-specific signs such as laziness are also typical, with muscle pain in the legs as an initial sign, but they always evolve into bleeding, gum problems, putrid smell and other signs that Vesalius would have described. As a doctor, Vesalius would have been well placed to recognize these signs and to describe them. None of them appear in any account.

Authors claiming typical signs were present make a lot of the so-called melancholy and refer to the writings of the 16th century expert Johannus Echthius who wrote a treatise about scurvy in Latin, as was customary in these days, in 1541, although it was only published after his death in 1556 [13] Despite being considered an expert on scurvy, Echtihius –and all “experts” of his day could recognize the disease – they knew little about the causes of scurvy, its link with vitamin C and the treatment. In fact Echthius and his 16th century colleagues were dead wrong about the causes of scurvy. Echthius obtained his knowledge entirely from studying Greek and Roman classics, Celsus, Galen and others, and came to the conclusion that scurvy was caused by a blocked spleen, leading to an excess of black bile. The treatment therefore consisted in hot and wet medicines like oil and vitriol. The only useful cure, citrus juice, was considered a “cold” medicine, therefore of no use [14]. Doctors at the time recommended avoiding fruits and vegetables in case of scurvy! Knowledge about the causes of scurvy would have to wait till the work of James Lind, an officer of the British Royal Navy who published his now famous treatise on scurvy in 1753 [15]

But Echthius did know how to recognize the symptoms of scurvy: stomachache, a complaint of the mouth, and sceletyrbe, a complaint of the legs. Vesalius showed none of these symptoms. 

In another argument in favour of the scurvy theory, it is claimed that extreme fear and irrational behaviour … are well known early symptoms [Plessas ]. This is not the case. Lind was correct when he observed that “a listlessness to action … a lazy inactive disposition” that degenerates in “a universal lassitude” [Hisrchman] are typical signs. This is also the observation of one of the authors (RC) having observed scurvy patients in Ethiopian prisons [xx]


Article continued here: Did Andreas Vesalius really die from scurvy? (3)
Sources:

1. https://circulatingnow.nlm.nih.gov/2014/10/15/the-death-of-andreas-vesalius/ accessed 27.12.2016
2. Matheson Cullen, G. Vesalius and the inquisition myth. Lancet, January 14, 1928, p 105-6.
3. Dirix Th. In search of Andreas Vesalius. The quest for the lost grave. Lannoo, 2014.
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andreas_Vesalius accessed on January 21, 2016
5. Biesbrouck M, Goddeeris Th, Steeno O. The last months of Andreas Vesalius. A coda. In Vesalius, Acta Internationalia Historiae Medicinae. 2012, 18 (No 2), 70-75.
6. Plessas P. http://www.parathemata.com/2014/09/pavlos-plessas-powerful-indications.html 2014. Accessed January 21, 2016.
7. http://www.dev.clinicalanatomy.com/andreas-vesalius
Aa https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/VitaminC-HealthProfessional/
8. Fain, O. La Revue de Médecine Interne, 2004; vol 25, Issue 12, 872-880.
9. Hodges RE, Hood J, Canham HE, Sauberlich HE, Baker EM. Clinical manifestations of ascorbic acid deficiency in man. Am J Clin Nutr 1971;24:432-43.
x. Hirschman JV, Raugi GJ. Adult scurvy. Journal of American Academy of Dermatology, 1999, 41; No 6, 895-909.
xx. Bartley W, Krebs HA, O’Brien JRP. Vitamin C requirement of human adults. Medical Research Council Special Report Series No 280. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office; 1953. P 1-179. Quoted in Hirschmann et al.
xxx Hodges RE, Baker EM, Hood J, Saueberlich HE, March SC. Experimental scurvy in man. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1969;22:535-48.
10. Harrisons Principles of Internal Medicine, 1998; p 484-85
11. Leung FW, Guze PA: Adult scurvy. Annals of Emergency medicine; 1981; 10:652-655
12. Bennet M, Coninx R. The mystery of the wooden leg: vitamin C deficiency in East African prisons. Tropical Doctor, 2005; 35: 81-84.
13. Carpenter K. The history if scurvy and vitamin C.Cambridge University Press 1986, p29.
11. Bown S R. 4he Age of Scurvy. How a surgeon, a mariner and a gentleman helped Britain win the battle of Trafalgar. Summersdale, 2003, p 96-99.
15. Lind J. A treatise of the scurvy. Containing an inquiry into the nature, causes and cure of that disease. Together with a critical and chronological view of what has been published on the subject. Edinburgh: Sands, Murray and Cochran: 1753.
16. Kinsman RA, Hood J: Some behavioural effects of ascorbic acid deficiency. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1971, 455-464.
17. Biesbrouck M, Goddeeris Th, Steeno O: ‘Post Mortem’ Andreae Vesalii (1514 – 1564). Deel II. Het graf van Andreas Vesalius op Zakynthos. A. Vesalius, nr.4 December 2015. [in Dutch].
18. Bruce M Rothschild. Scurvy imaging. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/413463-overview